Data and Publications
Contact Us
651-259-7384 651-259-7384
Data and Publications Menu

Westward Pull


By Amanda Rohrer
December 2011

PDF of article

Thousands of people living in western Minnesota cross the border every day to work in North Dakota, home of the nation’s lowest unemployment rate.

Job numbers and unemployment rates are tied to political boundaries, but Minnesotans are not.  Every county in Minnesota has residents who work outside the state. Whether through unconventional work arrangements or — in the case of border residents — because of proximity, a substantial number of Minnesotans work elsewhere.

All border counties have a higher proportion of cross-state commuters than counties that are more centrally located, and the counties that are near or part of a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) have the highest ratios of residents who depart during the work day. In 2009, 27,182 Minnesotans worked in North Dakota, the most popular out-of-state destination for daily commuters.

As would be expected, most people who commute to North Dakota live in counties bordering the state. The highest concentrations are in Clay, Wilkin, and Polk counties, which are part of or adjacent to the major North Dakota MSAs of Fargo-Moorhead and Grand Forks-East Grand Forks. Minnesota has no major metro areas in the western part of the state, so the border cities of North Dakota attract workers from a substantial slice of Minnesota: Kittson, Marshall, Polk, Red Lake, Norman, Clay, Becker, Wilkin, and Otter Tail counties (see Map 1 and Table 1).

 

Map 1: Minnesotans Working Outside the State by County

 

 

Table 1

Job Counts by States Where Minnesota Workers are Employed

 

 

   2009  

Count

Share of
Cross-State
Commuters

  North Dakota

27,182

41.48%

  Wisconsin

19,106

29.15%

  Iowa

5,257

8.02%

  South Dakota

4,771

7.28%

  Illinois

1,750

2.67%

Source: U.S Census Bureau, Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, 2009 data

 

 

North Dakota’s lowest-in-the-nation 3.5 percent unemployment rate (October 2011) has attracted press coverage and speculation about the state’s economic strength and its draw for struggling workers elsewhere. Over the last decade more Minnesotans have moved to North Dakota than the reverse. That trend has intensified since the start of the recession, with the difference increasing from 690 in 2006 to 8,789 in 2008 before dropping back to 6,075 in 2009 (see Figure 1). Although the trend may be short-lived and fairly volatile, it does illustrate the attraction of the state. 

 

Figure 1: Minnesotans Leaving for North Dakota Since 2001

 

Commuting patterns, however, don’t reflect a similar trend. Other than a slight dip mid-decade that corresponds with the lowest outflow year, the share of the Minnesota workforce commuting to North Dakota from the analysis area along the border of the two states has remained remarkably consistent at around 26 percent over the past 10 years.

The more populous counties along the border all fall in North Dakota, so commuting patterns are, logically, weighted westward — that is, people in Minnesota commuting to jobs in North Dakota. In the analysis area outlined by a dotted line on Map 1, there were 70,357 positions and 87,884 working residents, so a net 17,527 people leave for jobs outside of the area. The largest share, about two-thirds, commutes westward into North Dakota.

Of the 19,619 people who commute into the study area for jobs, 52 percent are from more eastern counties in Minnesota, while 45 percent are from North Dakota.

While the demographic and income data specific to commuters are limited, the broad overview available hints at some meaningful trends (see Table 2). People under 30 are more likely to leave or come into the area to work than they are to stay there for jobs. Non-commuters, on the other hand, are more likely to fall into the highest age bracket (55 or older). Whether they’ve had time to move closer to their place of work or their experience allows them greater flexibility in finding work near home, non-commuting Minnesotans are older overall.

 

Table 2

Characteristics of Workers Commuting to and from Western Minnesota Study Area, 2009

 

 

Leaving

Coming

Staying

Count

Share

Count

Share

Count

Share

Jobs Filled

37,146

100.0%

19,619

100.0%

50,738

100.0%

Workers Aged 29 or Younger

10,481

28.2%

6,228

31.7%

12,150

23.9%

Workers Aged 30 to 54

20,074

54.0%

9,693

49.4%

27,154

53.5%

Workers Aged 55 or Older

6,591

17.7%

3,698

18.8%

11,434

22.5%

Workers Earning $1,250 Per Month or Less

8,817

23.7%

5,937

30.3%

14,704

29.0%

Workers Earning $1,251 to $3,333 Per Month

16,522

44.5%

8,315

42.4%

21,786

42.9%

Workers Earning More Than $3,333 Per Month

11,807

31.8%

5,367

27.4%

14,248

28.1%

Workers in the “Goods Producing” Industry Class

6,785

18.3%

2,829

14.4%

9,753

19.2%

Workers in the “Trade, Transportation, and Utilities” Industry Class

8,943

24.1%

5,693

29.0%

10,513

20.7%

Workers in the “All Other Services” Industry Class

21,418

57.7%

11,097

56.6%

30,472

60.1%

Source: U.S Census Bureau, Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, 2009 data

 

Few people cross state lines for the lowest-wage jobs. Those earning less than $1,250 a month (about $15,000 annually) make up a significantly smaller share of the people leaving the study area than those either coming or staying. Because most people commuting into the study area are from more eastern counties within Minnesota, this suggests that the study area attracts workers who have fewer options in their rural counties.

The type of work people are traveling to also varies. While the occupants of the study area are nearly equally likely to work in goods-producing industries whether they work close to home or commute, the people coming into the area for work are more likely to work in trade, transportation, and utilities. Because jobs in trade, transportation, and utilities tend to pay less than manufacturing, that may explain why wages for workers coming to the study area generally are lower than wages for people who commute to jobs outside the area.

Younger workers are commuting to the study area to take expanding wholesale trade and transportation and warehousing jobs (see Table 3). These jobs are growing in the study region because of the need to serve the expanding North Dakota market.

 

Table 3

Trade, Transportation and Utilities Jobs in the Study Area
by NAICS Industry Sector

 

2009

2002

  Utilities

568

678

  Wholesale Trade

4,024

2,797

  Retail Trade

9,192

10,543

  Transportation and Warehousing

2,422

1,826

Source: U.S Census Bureau, Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics, 2009 data

 

 

Cass County in North Dakota, home of Fargo, was the county Minnesotans are most likely to commute to, pulling in 16,120 workers, or nearly 70 percent of North Dakota-bound commuters from the study area. Grand Forks County attracted 4,553 Minnesotans in 2009, while Richland County, adjacent to the Fargo-Moorhead MSA, pulled in 1,321 Minnesotans. Other Minnesota commuters were scattered across counties that attracted fewer than 300 people each. 

Despite the diverse destinations, most people don’t travel far for work. Of the 43,330 people within the selection area commuting west, southwest, or northwest but not necessarily out of the state, 60.6 percent traveled fewer than 10 miles to work. Another 21.1 percent traveled between 10 and 24 miles to work, meaning that about 80 percent of workers in the area had a reasonable commute of less than 30 minutes.

The labor market along the Minnesota-North Dakota border is a seamless whole, unconcerned with the arbitrary location of political boundaries. Concentrations of jobs and businesses attract and influence people and economic trends, so the cities are the critical elements. Short-term employment trends have attracted the young and mobile to some parts of the state, but the established economy along the border has continued on an even keel.

 

Top